1913 1999

Benjamin Bloom

Mastery learningFormative assessment

in Skill formation

American educational psychologist (Benjamin Samuel Bloom, 1913–1999), Charles H. Swift Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago from 1970 until his retirement. Two pieces of work outside this corpus account for most of his name recognition outside the assessment field: the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (1956 and later editions), which is the source of the Bloom's taxonomy triangle that schools of education still teach; and the Developing Talent in Young People study (1985), an interview-based programme that identified consistent conditions across the developmental histories of 120 high-achieving individuals in six fields. The paper that matters for this topic is the 1984 Educational Researcher address that gave the field one of its anchoring problems.

Stake§

Bloom's stake by 1984 was the long-form one of a senior researcher near the end of a public career, restating the case for instructional methods his own programme had spent three decades refining. The Two Sigma Problem address was his AERA presidential lecture; it framed mastery learning — the approach he and his students had been developing since the 1960s — as the ground-truth method against which group instruction's failures could be measured. He was advocating for the approach as well as describing it.

Bloom's 1984 paper reported a finding from doctoral work supervised in his lab: students taught one-to-one with mastery techniques performed, on average, two standard deviations above students taught in a conventional classroom. The two-sigma figure is the lecture's organising provocation. The body of the paper is not a defence of the finding (which had been published already) but a search for group methods — interventions deliverable inside ordinary classrooms — that approached the tutoring effect's size without requiring a tutor per student. Bloom's review of the candidate methods identified four with effect sizes in the 0.5–1.0 sigma range, chief among them mastery learning, enhanced feedback, and improved prerequisite preparation.

Mastery learning is the construct Bloom built earliest and defended longest. The argument, developed across his Chicago graduate students through the late 1960s and 1970s, was that classroom failure is mostly an artefact of time: given enough time and corrective feedback, most students reach mastery on most material; the standard classroom denies both the time and the corrective loop. The instructional design that follows — short instructional units, formative test at the end, corrective re-teaching for those not yet at criterion, then advancing — is mastery learning as Bloom's tradition specified it.

Bloom is the senior figure in the assessment-side strand of the topic's literature. He was a teacher of teachers; the people who ran the formative-assessment research programme of the 1980s and 1990s (Sadler in Australia, Black and Wiliam in the UK) read Bloom's Taxonomy and the mastery-learning work as graduate students. The Two Sigma Problem address gave the field a numerical target and a research agenda — the search for group methods approaching the tutoring effect — that the formative- assessment, mastery-learning, and grading-reform programmes through the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s worked inside.

Bloom died in Chicago in September 1999, aged 86.

their concepts on the territory
Formative assessmentFormative assessment Mastery learningMastery learning

2 concepts in this scholar's webopen the full territory →