1888 1985

Carl Schmitt

The partisan (Schmitt)

in Chartered violence

German jurist and political theorist. Schmitt's early-Weimar work on the concept of the political and on constitutional theory established him as one of the most influential German legal thinkers of the twentieth century. He joined the Nazi Party in 1933 and became, for a time, the regime's most prominent academic legal apologist — the Kronjurist des Dritten Reiches in the contemporary phrase. Stripped of his academic positions after 1945, he never publicly renounced his Nazi-era writing; he continued to write and publish until his death, with influence on both the European New Right and on parts of the international-law and political-theory left.

Stake§

Schmitt is read with a permanently contested moral status. The intellectual content — the concept of the political, the friend-enemy distinction, the nomos of the earth, the theory of the partisan — is taken seriously across a wide political spectrum, but no responsible reading detaches the work from the biography. For the chartered- violence corpus the relevant text is Theorie des Partisanen (1963), which contributes the figure of the irregular combatant defined by telluric attachment — useful as analysis, biographically situated.

The chartered-violence corpus uses Schmitt's partisan figure as one of the conceptual hinges between the Westphalian and post-Westphalian regimes of armed force. The partisan, in Schmitt's late thought, is the combatant who cannot be assimilated into the state-on-state law of war because the partisan does not represent a state and does not fight in its uniform, but is also not pursuing private ends — the partisan fights for a piece of land that is the partisan's own.

That figure maps with surprising precision onto the Ukrainian private air-defence operator of the late 2020s, who is land-tied, locally interested, militarily trained but not military, and defending property that is in some sense literally theirs. Schmitt's framework names the category cleanly even when the political register of his work is unusable.

Works in this corpus§

their concepts on the territory
The partisan (Schmitt)The partisan (Schmitt)

1 concept in this scholar's webopen the full territory →

excerpts

Another limitation follows from the telluric character of the partisan. He defends a piece of land with which he has an autochthonous relation. His fundamental position remains defensive, despite the intensive mobility of his tactics.
Theory of the Partisan (1963), p. 92

The line that fixes the partisan to soil rather than to ideology — the dividing wall between Schmitt's classical partisan (the Spanish guerrilleros against Napoleon) and the modern revolutionary partisan (Lenin, Mao), whose attachment is to a global cause rather than a piece of ground.

on The partisan (Schmitt)