Yair Pinto

Unity of consciousnessCross-cueing

in Split brain

Yair Pinto, cognitive scientist and experimental psychologist at the Department of Psychology and the Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, University of Amsterdam. A consciousness researcher in the recurrent-processing tradition associated with Victor Lamme, he led the 2017 study that reopened the question of what the split brain does to conscious experience.

Stake§

Theoretical and reputational. The work is openly revisionist — set against the Sperry–Gazzaniga textbook reading and positioned within a particular camp in consciousness science — so it carries an agenda the paper states rather than hides.

Pinto's contribution to this topic is an explicit, named challenge to its founding interpretation. Testing two callosotomy patients across many tasks, his 2017 Brain paper confirms that perception is split — the hemispheres cannot compare across the visual midline — but finds that the patients can report a stimulus anywhere in the field with either hand or by speaking, which he reads as one conscious agent rather than two. The result turns on ruling out cross-cueing, and it presses not only on Sperry's reading but on modern theories that tie consciousness to information integration.

Works in this corpus§

their concepts on the territory
Cross-cueingCross-cueing Unity of consciousnessUnity of consciousness

2 concepts in this scholar's webopen the full territory →

excerpts

These findings suggest that severing the cortical connections between hemispheres splits visual perception, but does not create two independent conscious perceivers within one brain.
Split brain: divided perception but undivided consciousness (2017)

The abstract's reversal of the classic reading: perception divides, but the conscious subject does not. Set directly against [[source:sperry-1968-hemisphere-deconnection|Sperry's]] [[concept:unity-of-consciousness|two-minds]] interpretation.

on Unity of consciousness

with two patients, and across a wide variety of tasks we have shown that severing the cortical connections between the two hemispheres does not seem to lead to two independent conscious agents within one brain.
Split brain: divided perception but undivided consciousness (2017)

The conclusion stated plainly. The patients could report stimuli anywhere in the visual field with either hand or by speaking — the result that breaks the canonical left-field/left-hand rule.

on Unity of consciousness